Category: Constitutional Violations
-
The Grand Jury Trap: Why Prosecution by Information Is Fraud
By: Joel Stephen Mattson If you’ve been charged with a crime, chances are your case never even saw a Grand Jury. Instead, you were prosecuted by something called an “INFORMATION” — a piece of paper drafted by a prosecutor, rubber-stamped by a judge, and used to haul you into court. Sounds official, doesn’t it? But…
-
Joel Stephen Mattson – Constitutional Analyst
“We Don’t Beg for Rights. We Enforce Them.” Welcome to the front line of legal warfare. This isn’t a blog. It’s a constitutional armory built for one mission: Expose fraud. Assert rights. Dismantle unlawful authority. Every court case. Every government action. Every so-called law— only holds power if you consent. And we’re here to make…
-
The Consent Trap Series
By: Joel Stephen Mattson How Jurisdiction, Consent, and Hidden Contracts Are Used to Steal Your Rights Welcome to The Consent Trap Series — the most important legal awakening you’ll ever read. This isn’t legal theory. This is the hard truth about how millions of people are stripped of their rights every year by courts that…
-
Templates and Tools: How to File Your Notice of Non-Consent
By: Joel Stephen Mattson Once you realize you’re standing in an administrative court, the next step is to take action. This article gives you ready-to-use tools to assert your rights, withdraw consent, and demand your case be heard in a constitutional court of record. Below are templates and step-by-step instructions to help you take immediate…
-
The Magistrate Act and the Affidavit That Exposes Unlawful Imprisonment
By: Joel Stephen Mattson Every year, tens of thousands of people are railroaded into jails and prisons not by law, not by due process, but by bureaucratic procedure, prosecutorial fraud, and unconstitutional shortcuts. Most of them have no idea that the court which imprisoned them had no jurisdiction — and that the key to their…
-
Article III, Section 2, Clause 1: The Clause That Nullifies Most Courtrooms
By: Joel Stephen Mattson There’s a clause in the Constitution so powerful, so ignored, and so weaponized against tyranny that most attorneys never speak of it. But when a Pro Se warrior invokes it — properly, on the record — it cuts through courtroom fraud like a blade through paper. That clause is Article III,…
-
Why Pro Se Warriors Are Feared
By: Joel Stephen Mattson They fear the Pro Se warrior because he’s not bought, not bound, and not blind. He’s the one figure in the courtroom they can’t predict, can’t manipulate, and can’t silence. He is a rogue element in a tightly controlled system. The moment a man walks into court and represents himself with…
-
Why Pro Se Warriors Are the System’s Worst Fear
By: Joel Stephen Mattson They told you the law was too complicated for the average person. That if you stepped into court without an attorney, you were doomed to fail. But what they didn’t tell you — what they couldn’t afford for you to discover — is that a Pro Se litigant armed with truth,…
-
HOW TO RECOGNIZE LEGAL FICTIONS BEFORE THEY TRAP YOU
By: Joel Stephen Mattson The court doesn’t come at you directly. It creates a character—a legal fiction—then waits for you to step into it. Once you do, you’ve agreed to their rules, their procedures, and their punishment. But that character isn’t you. It’s a construct, a NAME IN ALL CAPS, a trust account, a statutory…
-
HOW TO USE THE CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE TO EXPOSE GOVERNMENT FRAUD
By: Joel Stephen Mattson When the government acts like a business, it becomes one. And when it acts like a corporation, it loses its power to compel you—unless there’s a contract. That’s not a theory. It’s the law. It’s called the Clearfield Doctrine, and it’s the key to exposing how almost everything they do—fines, demands,…
-
HOW TO CHALLENGE THE COURT’S ASSUMED AUTHORITY WITH ONE AFFIDAVIT
By: Joel Stephen Mattson Most people walk into court thinking they have to prove something. But the truth is: they have to prove authority first. And if they don’t, nothing else matters. Every court assumes jurisdiction. Every officer assumes authority. Every agency assumes you’re under their control. But assumption is not law. And if you…
-
HOW TO DEMAND A REAL ARTICLE III JUDGE AND FORCE THE SYSTEM TO COMPLY
By: Joel Stephen Mattson The Constitution guarantees you a real judge—one with life tenure, lawful authority, and the power to hear a case under the Constitution itself, not corporate policy. But most people never see one. Why? Because courts have replaced real judges with administrative officers, magistrates, and state-licensed actors who operate under Article I…
-
HOW TO LEGALLY REBUT THE COURT’S FALSE IDENTITY GAME
By: Joel Stephen Mattson The court calls a name. You answer. But in that split second, a legal trick just took place—you agreed to be someone you’re not. This is the false identity game, and it’s how courts convert living men and women into corporate fictions they can control, charge, fine, and imprison. But you’re…
-
HOW TO LEGALLY REBUT THE COURT’S FALSE IDENTITY GAME
By: Joel Stephen Mattson The court calls a name. You answer. But in that split second, a legal trick just took place—you agreed to be someone you’re not. This is the false identity game, and it’s how courts convert living men and women into corporate fictions they can control, charge, fine, and imprison. But you’re…
-
WHY SILENCE IN COURT EQUALS CONSENT (UNLESS YOU DO THIS)
By: Joel Stephen Mattson In most cases, the system doesn’t beat you with facts or evidence. It beats you with silence—your silence. And when you don’t object, don’t rebut, and don’t file—everything you didn’t say gets counted as agreement. This is the dark side of court procedure: Silence equals consent. Unless you know how to…
-
HOW TO TURN THEIR COURTROOM TRICKS INTO CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS
By: Joel Stephen Mattson Not all violations happen in court. In fact, most of the real damage is done before you even step through the door. Officers fabricate reports. Sheriffs withhold evidence. Prosecutors file charges they know are false. Then the court pretends everything’s valid—unless you expose the fraud from the beginning. This article isn’t…
-
HOW TO FORCE THE COURT TO PROVE JURISDICTION WITH ONE FILING
By: Joel Stephen Mattson The one word courts fear the most isn’t “guilty” or “appeal.” It’s jurisdiction. Because without it, the court has no power—no matter how confident the judge acts or how loudly the prosecutor demands a conviction. Every court must prove it has jurisdiction over the subject, the location, and the person. If…