Tag: court fraud exposure

  • Fraud By Omission: How Courts Violate the Constitution by Withholding Truth About Consent

    By: Joel Stephen Mattson They Never Told You the Truth—Because the Whole System Rests on Your Ignorance If you’ve ever stepped foot into a courtroom, chances are no one explained that your participation—your silence, your compliance, even your respectful tone—was being interpreted as consent to the court’s jurisdiction. This is not a mistake. It’s not…

  • Pro Se Liberation: How Families Can Challenge Unlawful Incarceration Without an Attorney — And Win

    By: Joel Stephen Mattson – Constitutional Advocate & Scholar of Constitutional Law **Pro Se Liberation: How Families Can Challenge Unlawful Incarceration Without an Attorney — And Win** Every year, thousands of families are left devastated by wrongful convictions, unjust plea deals, and rigged proceedings where the truth was never allowed to surface. The common belief…

  • HOW TO USE THE MAGISTRATE ACT TO REVERSE JURISDICTION

    By: Joel Stephen Mattson They never told you that magistrates only have power with your consent. They didn’t tell you that the entire magistrate court process is administrative, not constitutional. And they definitely didn’t tell you that the original Magistrate Act of 1974 required the court to inform you of your right to withhold that…

  • Millions of Inmates, One Hidden Rule: Consent Makes or Breaks the Entire System

    By: Joel Stephen Mattson There’s a reason the United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world—and it’s not just about crime. It’s about jurisdictional fraud, hidden consent, and a silent legal presumption that traps millions of people without them even realizing it. The foundation of nearly every conviction in America is this one…

  • You Never Consented: Why Silence Is Not a Contract in Court

    By: Joel Stephen Mattson Most people believe that by simply showing up to court, they’re complying with a lawful process. But what they don’t realize is that just stepping into the courtroom—especially an Article I court—is being interpreted as consent to that court’s jurisdiction. Not because you agreed in writing, not because you signed a…